Home  ›  Ovid the Art of Love Long Term Relationship or Short Term Relationship

Ovid the Art of Love Long Term Relationship or Short Term Relationship

Written By Friday, May 6, 2022 Add Comment Edit

Emotion

Love encompasses a range of strong and positive emotional and mental states, from the most sublime virtue or skillful habit, the deepest interpersonal affection, to the simplest pleasance.[1] [2] An case of this range of meanings is that the love of a female parent differs from the love of a spouse, which differs from the love for food. About usually, dearest refers to a feeling of a stiff attraction and emotional zipper.[three] [iv] [ additional citation(s) needed ]

Love is considered to be both positive and negative, with its virtue representing human kindness, compassion, and affection, every bit "the unselfish loyal and benevolent concern for the good of another" and its vice representing human moral flaw, akin to vanity, selfishness, flirtation-propre, and egotism, every bit potentially leading people into a type of mania, obsessiveness or codependency.[5] [6] Information technology may also describe compassionate and affectionate actions towards other humans, i's self, or animals.[7] In its various forms, honey acts as a major facilitator of interpersonal relationships and, owing to its central psychological importance, is one of the near common themes in the artistic arts.[8] Honey has been postulated to be a part that keeps human beings together confronting menaces and to facilitate the continuation of the species.[9]

Ancient Greek philosophers identified six forms of dear: substantially, familial love (in Greek, Storge ), friendly love or ideal love ( Philia ), romantic love ( Eros ), self-love ( Philautia ), guest dear ( Xenia ), and divine love ( Agape ). Modern authors have distinguished further varieties of beloved: unrequited love, empty dear, companionate love, consummate love, infatuated honey, cocky-honey, and courtly love. Numerous cultures accept also distinguished Ren , Yuanfen , Mamihlapinatapai , Cafuné , Kama , Bhakti , Mettā , Ishq , Chesed , Amore , Charity , Saudade (and other variants or symbioses of these states), as culturally unique words, definitions, or expressions of love in regards to a specified "moments" currently defective in the English language.[10] [11] [12]

Scientific inquiry on emotion has increased significantly over the past two decades. The color bike theory of love defines three main, 3 secondary and nine tertiary dearest styles, describing them in terms of the traditional color wheel. The triangular theory of beloved suggests "intimacy, passion and commitment" are core components of love. Love has additional religious or spiritual meaning. This diversity of uses and meanings combined with the complexity of the feelings involved makes dearest unusually hard to consistently ascertain, compared to other emotional states.

Definitions

Romeo and Juliet, depicted equally they part on the balustrade in Act 3, 1867 by Ford Madox Brown

The word "dearest" can have a diverseness of related but distinct meanings in different contexts. Many other languages use multiple words to express some of the unlike concepts that in English are denoted as "honey"; one example is the plurality of Greek concepts for "love" (afraid, eros, philia, storge) .[13] Cultural differences in conceptualizing love thus doubly impede the establishment of a universal definition.[14]

Although the nature or essence of love is a subject area of frequent debate, different aspects of the word can be clarified by determining what isn't love (antonyms of "love"). Love equally a full general expression of positive sentiment (a stronger form of like) is commonly contrasted with hate (or neutral apathy). As a less-sexual and more-emotionally intimate form of romantic attachment, love is commonly assorted with lust. Every bit an interpersonal human relationship with romantic overtones, love is sometimes contrasted with friendship, although the word love is frequently applied to shut friendships or platonic love. (Farther possible ambiguities come up with usages "girlfriend", "young man", "just good friends").

Abstractly discussed, dear commonly refers to an experience one person feels for another. Honey often involves caring for, or identifying with, a person or matter (cf. vulnerability and care theory of honey), including oneself (cf. narcissism). In addition to cantankerous-cultural differences in agreement love, ideas about love have likewise changed greatly over time. Some historians date mod conceptions of romantic beloved to courtly Europe during or subsequently the Middle Ages, although the prior existence of romantic attachments is attested by ancient dear verse.[15]

The complex and abstract nature of love oftentimes reduces discourse of love to a thought-terminating cliché. Several common proverbs regard love, from Virgil'south "Love conquers all" to The Beatles' "All You Demand Is Love". St. Thomas Aquinas, following Aristotle, defines dearest as "to volition the expert of another."[16] Bertrand Russell describes honey as a status of "absolute value," as opposed to relative value.[ citation needed ] Philosopher Gottfried Leibniz said that love is "to exist delighted by the happiness of another."[17] Meher Baba stated that in love there is a "feeling of unity" and an "active appreciation of the intrinsic worth of the object of dear."[xviii] Biologist Jeremy Griffith defines honey equally "unconditional selflessness".[xix]

Impersonal

People can be said to honey an object, principle, or goal to which they are deeply committed and greatly value. For case, compassionate outreach and volunteer workers' "love" of their crusade may sometimes exist built-in not of interpersonal love merely impersonal love, altruism, and strong spiritual or political convictions.[20] People tin can likewise "love" material objects, animals, or activities if they invest themselves in bonding or otherwise identifying with those things. If sexual passion is as well involved, then this feeling is chosen paraphilia.[21]

Interpersonal

Interpersonal dearest refers to dear between human beings. It is a much more than stiff sentiment than a simple liking for a person. Unrequited honey refers to those feelings of love that are not reciprocated. Interpersonal love is nearly closely associated with Interpersonal relationships.[20] Such love might exist betwixt family members, friends, and couples. At that place are also a number of psychological disorders related to dear, such as erotomania. Throughout history, philosophy and religion accept done the most speculation on the phenomenon of beloved. In the 20th century, the scientific discipline of psychology has written a bully deal on the subject. In recent years, the sciences of psychology, anthropology, neuroscience, and biological science take added to the understanding of the concept of beloved.

Biological basis

Biological models of sexual practice tend to view love as a mammalian drive, much like hunger or thirst.[22] Helen Fisher, an anthropologist and human beliefs researcher, divides the experience of love into three partly overlapping stages: animalism, attraction, and zipper. Lust is the feeling of sexual desire; romantic attraction determines what partners mates find bonny and pursue, conserving time and energy past choosing; and attachment involves sharing a home, parental duties, mutual defense, and in humans involves feelings of safety and security.[23] Three distinct neural circuitries, including neurotransmitters, and three behavioral patterns, are associated with these three romantic styles.[23]

Pair of Lovers. 1480–1485

Lust is the initial passionate sexual want that promotes mating, and involves the increased release of chemicals such equally testosterone and estrogen. These effects rarely terminal more than than a few weeks or months. Allure is the more than individualized and romantic desire for a specific candidate for mating, which develops out of lust as commitment to an individual mate forms. Contempo studies in neuroscience have indicated that as people fall in dear, the brain consistently releases a sure set of chemicals, including the neurotransmitter hormones, dopamine, norepinephrine, and serotonin, the aforementioned compounds released by amphetamine, stimulating the encephalon'south pleasance eye and leading to side effects such as increased centre charge per unit, loss of ambition and sleep, and an intense feeling of excitement. Inquiry has indicated that this stage by and large lasts from one and a half to 3 years.[24]

Since the lust and attraction stages are both considered temporary, a third stage is needed to account for long-term relationships. Attachment is the bonding that promotes relationships lasting for many years and fifty-fifty decades. Attachment is mostly based on commitments such every bit marriage and children, or mutual friendship based on things like shared interests. It has been linked to college levels of the chemicals oxytocin and vasopressin to a greater degree than brusque-term relationships have.[24] Enzo Emanuele and coworkers reported the protein molecule known as the nerve growth factor (NGF) has loftier levels when people first fall in love, but these return to previous levels later one yr.[25]

Psychological footing

Psychology depicts love as a cognitive and social phenomenon. Psychologist Robert Sternberg formulated a triangular theory of honey and argued that dearest has 3 unlike components: intimacy, commitment, and passion. Intimacy is a course in which two people share confidences and various details of their personal lives, and is usually shown in friendships and romantic love affairs. Delivery, on the other mitt, is the expectation that the relationship is permanent. The last form of love is sexual attraction and passion. Passionate dearest is shown in infatuation every bit well equally romantic love. All forms of love are viewed equally varying combinations of these three components. Not-beloved does not include any of these components. Liking simply includes intimacy. Infatuated love only includes passion. Empty love but includes commitment. Romantic love includes both intimacy and passion. Companionate dear includes intimacy and delivery. Fatuous love includes passion and delivery. Lastly, consummate love includes all 3 components.[26] American psychologist Zick Rubin sought to define honey past psychometrics in the 1970s. His piece of work states that three factors constitute love: attachment, caring, and intimacy.[27] [28]

Post-obit developments in electrical theories such as Coulomb's law, which showed that positive and negative charges concenter, analogs in human life were developed, such as "opposites attract". Over the last century, research on the nature of human mating has generally found this non to be true when it comes to graphic symbol and personality—people tend to like people similar to themselves. However, in a few unusual and specific domains, such every bit allowed systems, it seems that humans adopt others who are unlike themselves (e.g., with an orthogonal immune system), since this volition lead to a infant that has the best of both worlds.[29] In recent years, various homo bonding theories take been developed, described in terms of attachments, ties, bonds, and affinities. Some Western government disaggregate into two chief components, the altruistic and the egotistic. This view is represented in the works of Scott Peck, whose work in the field of applied psychology explored the definitions of beloved and evil. Peck maintains that love is a combination of the "concern for the spiritual growth of another," and uncomplicated narcissism.[30] In combination, love is an activity, not but a feeling.

Psychologist Erich Fromm maintained in his book The Art of Loving that love is not but a feeling simply is also actions, and that in fact, the "feeling" of honey is superficial in comparing to one'south commitment to love via a serial of loving actions over time.[20] In this sense, Fromm held that beloved is ultimately not a feeling at all, but rather is a commitment to, and adherence to, loving actions towards another, oneself, or many others, over a sustained duration.[20] Fromm likewise described love as a conscious selection that in its early stages might originate as an involuntary feeling, but which then later no longer depends on those feelings, only rather depends only on conscious delivery.[twenty]

Evolutionary footing

Wall of Love on Montmartre in Paris: "I love you" in 250 languages, by calligraphist Fédéric Baron and artist Claire Kito (2000)

Evolutionary psychology has attempted to provide diverse reasons for love as a survival tool. Humans are dependent on parental aid for a large portion of their lifespans compared to other mammals. Love has therefore been seen as a mechanism to promote parental support of children for this extended time period. Furthermore, researchers as early every bit Charles Darwin himself identified unique features of human love compared to other mammals and credit love equally a major factor for creating social support systems that enabled the development and expansion of the homo species.[31] Another factor may exist that sexually transmitted diseases tin can cause, amid other effects, permanently reduced fertility, injury to the fetus, and increase complications during childbirth. This would favor monogamous relationships over polygamy.[32]

Adaptive benefit

Interpersonal honey betwixt a male and a female is considered to provide an evolutionary adaptive benefit since information technology facilitates mating and sexual reproduction.[33] Nonetheless, some organisms tin reproduce asexually without mating. Thus understanding the adaptive do good of interpersonal love depends on agreement the adaptive benefit of sexual reproduction as opposed to asexual reproduction. Michod[33] has reviewed show that love, and consequently sexual reproduction, provides two major adaptive advantages. First, honey leading to sexual reproduction facilitates repair of damages in the Dna that is passed from parent to progeny (during meiosis, a key stage of the sexual process). Second, a factor in either parent may comprise a harmful mutation, simply in the progeny produced past sex reproduction, expression of a harmful mutation introduced by one parent is likely to be masked by expression of the unaffected homologous cistron from the other parent.[33]

Comparison of scientific models

Biological models of honey tend to run into it every bit a mammalian drive, similar to hunger or thirst.[22] Psychology sees love equally more than of a social and cultural phenomenon. Certainly, dearest is influenced by hormones (such equally oxytocin), neurotrophins (such every bit NGF), and pheromones, and how people remember and bear in dear is influenced past their conceptions of love. The conventional view in biological science is that in that location are two major drives in dear: sexual allure and attachment. Attachment betwixt adults is presumed to work on the same principles that atomic number 82 an baby to become attached to its mother. The traditional psychological view sees love as being a combination of companionate love and passionate love. Passionate beloved is intense longing, and is oft accompanied by physiological arousal (shortness of breath, rapid heart rate); companionate love is affection and a feeling of intimacy non accompanied by physiological arousal.

Cultural views

Ancient Greek

Roman copy of a Greek sculpture past Lysippus depicting Eros, the Greek personification of romantic dear

Greek distinguishes several different senses in which the give-and-take "love" is used. Ancient Greeks identified four forms of honey: kinship or familiarity (in Greek, storge), friendship and/or platonic desire (philia), sexual and/or romantic desire (eros), and self-emptying or divine love (afraid).[34] [35] Mod authors have distinguished further varieties of romantic love.[36] Yet, with Greek (as with many other languages), it has been historically hard to separate the meanings of these words totally. At the same fourth dimension, the Ancient Greek text of the Bible has examples of the verb agapo having the aforementioned pregnant as phileo.

Agape ( ἀγάπη agápē) means love in modern-day Greek. The term south'agapo means I love you in Greek. The word agapo is the verb I beloved. It mostly refers to a "pure," ideal type of beloved, rather than the physical attraction suggested by eros. However, in that location are some examples of agape used to mean the same equally eros. It has also been translated equally "love of the soul."[37]

Eros ( ἔρως érōs) (from the Greek deity Eros) is passionate dear, with sensual desire and longing. The Greek word erota means in dear. Plato refined his ain definition. Although eros is initially felt for a person, with contemplation information technology becomes an appreciation of the beauty within that person, or even becomes appreciation of dazzler itself. Eros helps the soul call back knowledge of beauty and contributes to an understanding of spiritual truth. Lovers and philosophers are all inspired to seek truth by eros. Some translations list it every bit "love of the body".[37]

Philia ( φιλία philía), a dispassionate virtuous honey, was a concept addressed and developed by Aristotle in his Nicomachean Ethics Book Viii.[38] It includes loyalty to friends, family, and community, and requires virtue, equality, and familiarity. Philia is motivated by applied reasons; ane or both of the parties benefit from the relationship. It can also hateful "honey of the mind."

Storge ( στοργή storgē) is natural amore, similar that felt by parents for offspring.

Xenia (ξενία xenía), hospitality, was an extremely important practice in ancient Hellenic republic. It was an about ritualized friendship formed betwixt a host and his guest, who could previously have been strangers. The host fed and provided quarters for the invitee, who was expected to repay just with gratitude. The importance of this tin exist seen throughout Greek mythology—in particular, Homer'south Iliad and Odyssey.

Ancient Roman (Latin)

The Latin language has several different verbs respective to the English discussion "dear." amō is the basic verb meaning I honey, with the infinitive amare ("to dear") equally it still is in Italian today. The Romans used it both in an affectionate sense as well as in a romantic or sexual sense. From this verb come amans—a lover, amator, "professional lover," often with the accessory notion of lechery—and amica, "girlfriend" in the English sense, often existence practical euphemistically to a prostitute. The corresponding noun is amor (the significance of this term for the Romans is well illustrated in the fact, that the name of the city, Rome—in Latin: Roma—can exist viewed equally an anagram for amor, which was used as the secret name of the Metropolis in wide circles in aboriginal times),[39] which is too used in the plural form to indicate love affairs or sexual adventures. This same root as well produces amicus—"friend"—and amicitia, "friendship" (often based to mutual advantage, and respective sometimes more closely to "indebtedness" or "influence"). Cicero wrote a treatise called On Friendship (de Amicitia), which discusses the notion at some length. Ovid wrote a guide to dating called Ars Amatoria (The Art of Beloved), which addresses, in depth, everything from extramarital diplomacy to overprotective parents.

Latin sometimes uses amāre where English would simply say to similar. This notion, however, is much more generally expressed in Latin by the terms placere or delectāre, which are used more colloquially, the latter used frequently in the dearest poetry of Catullus. Diligere often has the notion "to exist affectionate for," "to esteem," and rarely if ever is used for romantic love. This word would be appropriate to describe the friendship of two men. The corresponding substantive diligentia, withal, has the pregnant of "diligence" or "carefulness," and has niggling semantic overlap with the verb. Observare is a synonym for diligere; despite the cognate with English language, this verb and its corresponding noun, observantia, frequently announce "esteem" or "affection." Caritas is used in Latin translations of the Christian Bible to hateful "charitable love"; this significant, however, is not institute in Classical pagan Roman literature. As it arises from a conflation with a Greek word, there is no corresponding verb.

Chinese and other Sinic

Two philosophical underpinnings of love exist in the Chinese tradition, one from Confucianism which emphasized actions and duty while the other came from Mohism which championed a universal love. A core concept to Confucianism is 仁 (Ren, "benevolent love"), which focuses on duty, action, and attitude in a relationship rather than love itself. In Confucianism, one displays benevolent love by performing actions such as filial piety from children, kindness from parents, loyalty to the king and so forth.

The concept of 愛 (Standard mandarin: ài) was developed past the Chinese philosopher Mozi in the quaternary century BC in reaction to Confucianism'south chivalrous dearest. Mozi tried to replace what he considered to be the long-entrenched Chinese over-attachment to family unit and clan structures with the concept of "universal love" ( 兼愛 , jiān'ài). In this, he argued directly confronting Confucians who believed that it was natural and correct for people to care nigh unlike people in different degrees. Mozi, by dissimilarity, believed people in principle should care for all people every bit. Mohism stressed that rather than adopting different attitudes towards different people, love should be unconditional and offered to everyone without regard to reciprocation; not just to friends, family and other Confucian relations. Later on in Chinese Buddhism, the term Ai ( 愛 ) was adopted to refer to a passionate, caring love and was considered a fundamental desire. In Buddhism, Ai was seen as capable of being either selfish or selfless, the latter beingness a key chemical element towards enlightenment.

In Standard mandarin Chinese, 愛 (ài) is often used equally the equivalent of the Western concept of love. 愛 (ài) is used as both a verb (e.g. 我愛你 , Wǒ ài nǐ, or "I love you") and a noun (such equally 愛情 àiqíng, or "romantic dear"). However, due to the influence of Confucian 仁 (rén), the phrase 我愛你 (Wǒ ài nǐ, I dearest you) carries with it a very specific sense of responsibility, commitment and loyalty. Instead of frequently saying "I love you" as in some Western societies, the Chinese are more likely to express feelings of affection in a more casual way. Consequently, "I like yous" ( 我喜欢你 , Wǒ xǐhuan nǐ) is a more common mode of expressing affection in Mandarin; it is more playful and less serious.[forty] This is also true in Japanese (suki da, 好きだ ).

Japanese

The Japanese linguistic communication uses 3 words to convey the English equivalent of "love". Because "honey" covers a wide range of emotions and behavioral phenomena, at that place are nuances distinguishing the three terms.[41] [42] The term ai ( 愛 ), which is ofttimes associated with maternal dear[41] or selfless dearest,[42] originally referred to dazzler and was oftentimes used in a religious context. Following the Meiji Restoration 1868, the term became associated with "honey" in order to translate Western literature. Prior to Western influence, the term koi ( 恋 or 孤悲 ) mostly represented romantic love, and was ofttimes the discipline of the popular Homo'yōshū Japanese poesy drove.[41] Koi describes a longing for a member of the reverse sex and is typically interpreted every bit selfish and wanting.[42] The term'due south origins come up from the concept of lone solitude as a outcome of separation from a loved one. Though modern usage of koi focuses on sexual love and infatuation, the Manyō used the term to cover a wider range of situations, including tenderness, benevolence, and material desire.[41] The tertiary term, ren'ai ( 恋愛 ), is a more than mod structure that combines the kanji characters for both ai and koi, though its usage more than closely resembles that of koi in the form of romantic love.[41] [42]

Indian

The love stories of the Hindu deities Krishna and Radha take influenced the Indian civilisation and arts. To a higher place: Radha Madhavam by Raja Ravi Varma.

In contemporary literature, the Sanskrit words for dearest is "sneha". Other terms such as Priya refers to innocent love, Prema refers to spiritual love, and Kama refers usually to sexual desire.[43] [44] However, the term also refers to any sensory enjoyment, emotional attraction and artful pleasure such as from arts, trip the light fantastic, music, painting, sculpture and nature.[45] [46]

The concept of kama is found in some of the earliest known verses in Vedas. For example, Book 10 of Rig Veda describes the creation of the universe from nothing by the dandy heat. There in hymn 129, it states:

कामस्तदग्रे समवर्तताधि मनसो रेतः परथमं यदासीत |
सतो बन्धुमसति निरविन्दन हर्दि परतीष्याकवयो मनीषा ||[47]

Thereafter rose Desire in the beginning, Desire the key seed and germ of Spirit,
Sages who searched with their heart'south thought discovered the existent'due south kinship in the non-existent.

Persian

The children of Adam are limbs of ane body
Having been created of one essence.
When the calamity of time afflicts i limb
The other limbs cannot remain at rest.
If you have no sympathy for the troubles of others
You are not worthy to be called past the name of "man".

Sa'di, Gulistan

Rumi, Hafiz,and Sa'di are icons of the passion and love that the Western farsi culture and language present.[ commendation needed ] The Persian word for love is Ishq, which is derived from Arabic language; nevertheless, it is considered by most to be too stalwart a term for interpersonal beloved and is more ordinarily substituted for "doost dashtan" ("liking").[ citation needed ] In the Persian civilisation, everything is encompassed by love and all is for love, starting from loving friends and family, husbands and wives, and somewhen reaching the divine love that is the ultimate goal in life.[ citation needed ]

Religious views

Abrahamic

Judaism

In Hebrew, אהבה (ahava) is the most commonly used term for both interpersonal dear and dear between God and God's creations. Chesed, oft translated equally loving-kindness, is used to describe many forms of honey between human beings.

The commandment to love other people is given in the Torah, which states, "Love your neighbor like yourself" (Leviticus 19:18). The Torah'due south commandment to love God "with all your middle, with all your soul and with all your might" (Deuteronomy 6:v) is taken by the Mishnah (a central text of the Jewish oral law) to refer to good deeds, willingness to sacrifice one'due south life rather than commit sure serious transgressions, willingness to sacrifice all of ane'southward possessions, and being grateful to the Lord despite arduousness (tractate Berachoth 9:5). Rabbinic literature differs as to how this love can be developed, e.m., past contemplating divine deeds or witnessing the marvels of nature.

Every bit for love between marital partners, this is deemed an essential ingredient to life: "Come across life with the wife you love" (Ecclesiastes 9:9). Rabbi David Wolpe writes that "...love is not only about the feelings of the lover...It is when ane person believes in another person and shows information technology." He further states that "...love...is a feeling that expresses itself in action. What we actually feel is reflected in what we do."[49] The biblical volume Song of Solomon is considered a romantically phrased metaphor of love between God and his people, but in its apparently reading, reads like a dear vocal. The 20th-century rabbi Eliyahu Eliezer Dessler is often quoted as defining love from the Jewish point of view as "giving without expecting to take" (from his Michtav me-Eliyahu, Vol. i).

Christianity

Love and not a i-way street in romanticism

The Christian agreement is that love comes from God, who is himself Honey (one Jn 4:viii). The love of man and woman—eros in Greek—and the unselfish love of others (agape), are oftentimes contrasted every bit "descending" and "ascending" love, respectively, just are ultimately the aforementioned thing.[50]

There are several Greek words for "dearest" that are regularly referred to in Christian circles.

  • Agape: In the New Testament, agapē is charitable, selfless, altruistic, and unconditional. Information technology is parental love, seen every bit creating goodness in the world; information technology is the way God is seen to love humanity, and it is seen every bit the kind of dear that Christians aspire to take for i another.[37]
  • Phileo: Also used in the New Attestation, phileo is a human response to something that is found to be delightful. Also known equally "brotherly love."
  • Two other words for love in the Greek linguistic communication, eros (sexual dearest) and storge (kid-to-parent dear), were never used in the New Testament.[37]

Christians believe that to Dear God with all your heart, listen, and strength and Love your neighbor as yourself are the ii most important things in life (the greatest commandment of the Jewish Torah, according to Jesus; cf. Gospel of Mark chapter 12, verses 28–34). Saint Augustine summarized this when he wrote "Love God, and do as yard wilt."

The Campaigner Paul glorified love as the virtually important virtue of all. Describing dearest in the famous poetic interpretation in 1 Corinthians, he wrote, "Dear is patient, beloved is kind. Information technology does not envy, it does not boast, it is non proud. Information technology is not rude, it is not self-seeking, it is not easily angered, it keeps no record of wrongs. Love does non delight in evil but rejoices with the truth. It always protects, always trusts, e'er hopes, and always perseveres." (1 Cor. 13:iv–7, NIV)

The Campaigner John wrote, "For God and so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall non perish but accept eternal life. For God did not ship his Son into the earth to condemn the world, but to save the world through him." (John 3:16–17, NIV) John also wrote, "Dear friends, let us love one another for love comes from God. Everyone who loves has been born of God and knows God. Whoever does non love does non know God, considering God is beloved." (1 John iv:vii–eight, NIV)

Saint Augustine wrote that one must be able to decipher the difference between love and lust. Animalism, according to Saint Augustine, is an overindulgence, only to love and exist loved is what he has sought for his entire life. He even says, "I was in beloved with love." Finally, he does autumn in love and is loved back, by God. Saint Augustine says the only i who tin beloved you truly and fully is God, because beloved with a human just allows for flaws such as "jealousy, suspicion, fear, acrimony, and contention." According to Saint Augustine, to dearest God is "to achieve the peace which is yours." (Saint Augustine's Confessions)

Augustine regards the duplex commandment of love in Matthew 22 as the middle of Christian faith and the interpretation of the Bible. Afterward the review of Christian doctrine, Augustine treats the problem of love in terms of use and enjoyment until the terminate of Volume I of De Doctrina Christiana (1.22.21–one.40.44;).[51]

Christian theologians see God as the source of dearest, which is mirrored in humans and their own loving relationships. Influential Christian theologian C. Southward. Lewis wrote a book called The Four Loves. Benedict XVI named his first encyclical God is dear. He said that a human being, created in the epitome of God, who is love, is able to practice love; to give himself to God and others (afraid) and by receiving and experiencing God's dearest in contemplation (eros). This life of honey, according to him, is the life of the saints such equally Teresa of Calcutta and Mary, the female parent of Jesus and is the management Christians take when they believe that God loves them.[50]

Pope Francis taught that "True dear is both loving and letting oneself be loved...what is important in love is non our loving, but allowing ourselves to be loved by God."[52] And and so, in the analysis of a Catholic theologian, for Pope Francis, "the key to love...is non our action. It is the activity of the greatest, and the source, of all the powers in the universe: God's."[53]

In Christianity the practical definition of honey is summarised by Thomas Aquinas, who defined dearest as "to will the expert of another," or to desire for some other to succeed.[sixteen] This is an explanation of the Christian need to beloved others, including their enemies. Every bit Thomas Aquinas explains, Christian love is motivated by the need to see others succeed in life, to be skilful people.

Regarding love for enemies, Jesus is quoted in the Gospel of Matthew chapter five:

"You have heard that it was said, 'Love your neighbor and detest your enemy.' But I tell you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you lot, that yous may be children of your Father in heaven. He causes his sun to ascent on the evil and the skillful, and sends rain on the righteous and the unrighteous. If you love those who love you lot, what reward will you get? Are not even the tax collectors doing that? And if yous greet only your ain people, what are you doing more than others? Exercise non fifty-fifty pagans do that? Be perfect, therefore, as your heavenly Father is perfect." – Matthew five: 43–48.

Exercise non forget to love with forgiveness, Christ saved an adulterous woman from those who would stone her. A world of wronged hypocrites needs forgiving dearest. Mosaic Police force would hold Deuteronomy 22:22-24 "If a man is found lying with a adult female married to a married man, then both of them shall dice—the man that lay with the adult female, and the woman; so you lot shall put away the evil from Israel. If a young woman who is a virgin is betrothed to a husband, and a man finds her in the metropolis and lies with her, then you lot shall bring them both out to the gate of that city, and you shall stone them to death with stones, the young woman considering she did not weep out in the city, and the man considering he humbled his neighbor's wife; and then you shall put abroad the evil from amongst you."[54] [ round reference ]

Tertullian wrote regarding dear for enemies: "Our private, extraordinary, and perfect goodness consists in loving our enemies. To dearest one's friends is common do, to love one's enemies but among Christians."[55]

Islam

Al-Wadūd or The Loving is a name of God in Islam.

In Islam, one of the 99 names of God is Al-Wadūd , which means "The Loving"

Dear encompasses the Islamic view of life as universal brotherhood that applies to all who hold faith. Amongst the 99 names of God (Allah), there is the proper name Al-Wadud, or "the Loving I," which is establish in Surah [Quran 11:90] as well as Surah [Quran 85:fourteen]. God is likewise referenced at the beginning of every chapter in the Qur'an as Ar-Rahman and Ar-Rahim, or the "Nigh Compassionate" and the "Most Merciful", indicating that nobody is more loving, compassionate and benevolent than God. The Qur'an refers to God as being "full of loving kindness."

The Qur'an exhorts Muslim believers to care for all people, those who have not persecuted them, with birr or "deep kindness" as stated in Surah [Quran 6:eight-9]. Birr is also used by the Qur'an in describing the love and kindness that children must show to their parents.

Ishq, or divine love, is the emphasis of Sufism in the Islamic tradition. Practitioners of Sufism believe that dear is a projection of the essence of God to the universe. God desires to recognize dazzler, and as if one looks at a mirror to encounter oneself, God "looks" at himself within the dynamics of nature. Since everything is a reflection of God, the school of Sufism practices seeing the beauty inside the plain ugly. Sufism is often referred to as the religion of love.[56] God in Sufism is referred to in three master terms, which are the Lover, Loved, and Beloved, with the concluding of these terms beingness often seen in Sufi poetry. A common viewpoint of Sufism is that through love, humankind can get back to its inherent purity and grace. The saints of Sufism are infamous for existence "boozer" due to their love of God; hence, the constant reference to vino in Sufi poesy and music.

Bahá'í Religion

In his Paris Talks, `Abdu'l-Bahá described 4 types of love: the love that flows from God to human beings; the dear that flows from human beings to God; the love of God towards the Cocky or Identity of God; and the honey of human beings for man beings.[57]

Indian

Buddhism

In Buddhism, Kāma is sensuous, sexual dear. It is an obstacle on the path to enlightenment, since it is selfish. Karuṇā is compassion and mercy, which reduces the suffering of others. It is complementary to wisdom and is necessary for enlightenment. Adveṣa and mettā are benevolent love. This love is unconditional and requires considerable cocky-acceptance. This is quite different from ordinary love, which is usually about attachment and sexual practice and which rarely occurs without self-involvement. Instead, in Buddhism it refers to disengagement and unselfish interest in others' welfare.

The Bodhisattva ideal in Mahayana Buddhism involves the complete renunciation of oneself in order to take on the burden of a suffering earth.

Hinduism

In Hinduism, kāma is pleasurable, sexual love, personified past the god Kamadeva. For many Hindu schools, it is the 3rd finish (Kama) in life. Kamadeva is oftentimes pictured belongings a bow of sugar pikestaff and an arrow of flowers; he may ride upon a corking parrot. He is commonly accompanied by his consort Rati and his companion Vasanta, lord of the spring season. Rock images of Kamadeva and Rati can exist seen on the door of the Chennakeshava temple at Belur, in Karnataka, Republic of india. Maara is some other proper noun for kāma.

In dissimilarity to kāma, prema – or prem – refers to elevated dearest. Karuna is compassion and mercy, which impels 1 to aid reduce the suffering of others. Bhakti is a Sanskrit term, pregnant "loving devotion to the supreme God." A person who practices bhakti is called a bhakta. Hindu writers, theologians, and philosophers take distinguished nine forms of bhakti, which can be establish in the Bhagavata Purana and works past Tulsidas. The philosophical work Narada Bhakti Sutras, written by an unknown author (presumed to be Narada), distinguishes eleven forms of love.

In sure Vaishnava sects within Hinduism, attaining unadulterated, unconditional and incessant dearest for Godhead is considered the foremost goal of life. Gaudiya Vaishnavas who worship Krishna as the Supreme Personality of Godhead and the cause of all causes consider Love for Godhead (Prema) to act in ii ways: sambhoga and vipralambha (marriage and separation)—two opposites.[58]

In the condition of separation, in that location is an acute yearning for being with the beloved and in the condition of union, there is supreme happiness and nectarean. Gaudiya Vaishnavas consider that Krishna-prema (Love for Godhead) is not burn down just that it still burns away one's material desires. They consider that Kṛṣṇa-prema is not a weapon, only it even so pierces the heart. It is non water, but information technology washes away everything—one's pride, religious rules, and i's shyness. Krishna-prema is considered to make ane drown in the ocean of transcendental ecstasy and pleasure. The dearest of Radha, a cowherd daughter, for Krishna is often cited as the supreme example of dear for Godhead by Gaudiya Vaishnavas. Radha is considered to be the internal authority of Krishna, and is the supreme lover of Godhead. Her instance of honey is considered to be beyond the agreement of material realm as it surpasses whatever form of selfish love or lust that is visible in the fabric world. The reciprocal love between Radha (the supreme lover) and Krishna (God as the Supremely Loved) is the subject of many poetic compositions in India such as the Gita Govinda and Hari Bhakti Shuddhodhaya.

In the Bhakti tradition within Hinduism, information technology is believed that execution of devotional service to God leads to the development of Love for God (taiche bhakti-phale krsne prema upajaya), and as love for God increases in the heart, the more than one becomes costless from cloth contamination (krishna-prema asvada haile, bhava nasa paya). Beingness perfectly in love with God or Krishna makes one perfectly free from material contamination. and this is the ultimate way of salvation or liberation. In this tradition, salvation or liberation is considered inferior to love, and but an incidental past-product. Being captivated in Love for God is considered to be the perfection of life.[59]

Political views

Complimentary love

The term "free beloved" has been used[sixty] to depict a social movement that rejects marriage, which is seen as a form of social chains. The Gratuitous Dearest motility's initial goal was to split the state from sexual matters such as marriage, birth command, and adultery. It claimed that such issues were the concern of the people involved, and no 1 else.[61]

Many people in the early 19th century believed that marriage was an of import attribute of life to "fulfill earthly homo happiness." Middle-class Americans wanted the abode to exist a place of stability in an uncertain world. This mentality created a vision of strongly defined gender roles, which provoked the advocacy of the gratis honey movement as a contrast.[62]

The term "sexual practice radical" has been used interchangeably with the term "gratuitous lover".[ citation needed ] By whatever name, advocates had two strong beliefs: opposition to the idea of forceful sexual activity in a human relationship and advocacy for a woman to use her body in any way that she pleases.[63] These are likewise beliefs of Feminism.[64]

Philosophical views

The philosophy of love is a field of social philosophy and ethics that attempts to explain the nature of dear.[65] The philosophical investigation of love includes the tasks of distinguishing between the various kinds of personal beloved, asking if and how dearest is or tin be justified, asking what the value of dearest is, and what impact love has on the autonomy of both the lover and the love.[64]

See also

  • Colour wheel theory of love
  • Human bonding
  • Dear at first sight
  • Pair bond
  • Polyamory
  • Romance (dear)
  • Self-love
  • Social connection
  • Traditional forms, Agape, Philia, Philautia, Storge, Eros: Greek terms for dearest
  • Human relationship Scientific discipline

References

  1. ^ "Definition of Dear in English language". Oxford English Dictionary. Archived from the original on 2 May 2018. Retrieved ane May 2018.
  2. ^ "Definition of "Dear" - English Dictionary". Cambridge English Lexicon. Archived from the original on 2 May 2018. Retrieved i May 2018.
  3. ^ Oxford Illustrated American Dictionary (1998)
  4. ^ "Definition of Beloved". Definition of Love past Merriam-Webster. 27 Dec 1987. Retrieved 30 September 2021.
  5. ^ Roget's Thesaurus (1998) p. 592 and p. 639
  6. ^ "Love – Definition of dear past Merriam-Webster". merriam-webster.com. Archived from the original on 12 January 2012. Retrieved xiv December 2011.
  7. ^ Fromm, Erich; The Art of Loving, Harper Perennial (1956), Original English Version, ISBN 978-0-06-095828-two
  8. ^ "Article On Love". Archived from the original on xxx May 2012. Retrieved 13 September 2011.
  9. ^ Helen Fisher. Why We Love: the nature and chemical science of romantic love. 2004.
  10. ^ "What Is Love? A Philosophy of Life". HuffPost. 5 Dec 2014. Retrieved 2 October 2020.
  11. ^ Liddell and Scott: φιλία Archived 3 January 2017 at the Wayback Machine
  12. ^ Mascaró, Juan (2003). The Bhagavad Gita. Penguin Classics. Penguin. ISBN978-0-14-044918-i. (J. Mascaró, translator)
  13. ^ Anders Nygren, Agape and Eros.
  14. ^ Kay, Paul; Kempton, Willett (March 1984). "What is the Sapir–Whorf Hypothesis?". American Anthropologist. New Series. 86 (1): 65–79. doi:10.1525/aa.1984.86.1.02a00050.
  15. ^ "Ancient Dearest Poesy". Archived from the original on 30 September 2007.
  16. ^ a b "St. Thomas Aquinas, STh I–II, 26, four, corp. art". Newadvent.org. Archived from the original on 9 November 2011. Retrieved thirty October 2010.
  17. ^ Leibniz, Gottfried. "Confessio philosophi". Wikisource edition. Archived from the original on 27 April 2009. Retrieved 25 March 2009.
  18. ^ Baba, Meher (1995). Discourses. Myrtle Beach: Sheriar Press. p. 113. ISBN 978-i-880619-09-4.
  19. ^ What is love?. In The Book of Real Answers to Everything! Archived 16 January 2013 at the Wayback Auto Griffith, J. 2011. ISBN 978-1-74129-007-three.
  20. ^ a b c d e Fromm, Erich; The Art of Loving, Harper Perennial (5 September 2000), Original English Version, ISBN 978-0-06-095828-two
  21. ^ DiscoveryHealth. "Paraphilia". Archived from the original on 12 December 2007. Retrieved 16 Dec 2007.
  22. ^ a b Lewis, Thomas; Amini, F.; Lannon, R. (2000). A Full general Theory of Love. Random House. ISBN978-0-375-70922-vii.
  23. ^ a b "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 28 June 2011. Retrieved 3 October 2011. {{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived re-create as title (link) Defining the Brain Systems of Lust, Romantic Attraction, and Attachment by Fisher et al.
  24. ^ a b Winston, Robert (2004). Human. Smithsonian Establishment. ISBN978-0-03-093780-4.
  25. ^ Emanuele, E.; Polliti, P.; Bianchi, M.; Minoretti, P.; Bertona, M.; Geroldi, D. (2005). "Raised plasma nerve growth factor levels associated with early-stage romantic love". Psychoneuroendocrinology. 31 (iii): 288–294. doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2005.09.002. PMID 16289361. S2CID 18497668. Archived from the original on half-dozen Dec 2006. Retrieved 3 December 2006.
  26. ^ Sternberg, R.J. (1986). "A triangular theory of love". Psychological Review. 93 (2): 119–135. doi:10.1037/0033-295x.93.2.119.
  27. ^ Rubin, Zick (1970). "Measurement of Romantic Love". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 16 (2): 265–273. CiteSeerXx.1.i.452.3207. doi:10.1037/h0029841. PMID 5479131.
  28. ^ Rubin, Zick (1973). Liking and Loving: an invitation to social psychology . New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. ISBN9780030830037.
  29. ^ Berscheid, Ellen; Walster, Elaine H. (1969). Interpersonal Attraction. Addison-Wesley Publishing Co. ISBN978-0-201-00560-8. CCCN 69-17443.
  30. ^ Peck, Scott (1978). The Road Less Traveled. Simon & Schuster. p. 169. ISBN978-0-671-25067-half dozen.
  31. ^ Loye, David S. (2000). Darwin's Lost Theory of Honey: A Healing Vision for the 21st Century. iUniverse. p. 332. ISBN978-0-595-00131-6.
  32. ^ The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology, edited by David Thousand. Osculation, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2005. Chapter 14, Commitment, Love, and Mate Retention by Lorne Campbell and Bruce J. Ellis.
  33. ^ a b c Michod, R.East. (1989). What's love got to practise with it? The solution to ane of evolution's greatest riddles. The Sciences, May/June, 22-27. DOI:10.1002/j.2326-1951.1989.tb02156.10
  34. ^ C. S. Lewis, The Four Loves, 1960.
  35. ^ Kristeller, Paul Oskar (1980). Renaissance Thought and the Arts: Collected Essays. Princeton University Press. ISBN978-0-691-02010-five.
  36. ^ Stendhal, in his book On Dearest ("De 50'amour"; Paris, 1822), distinguished carnal love, passionate honey, a kind of uncommitted love that he called "taste-love", and dearest of vanity. Denis de Rougemont in his book Love in the Western World traced the story of passionate dearest (l'flirtation-passion) from its courtly to its romantic forms. Benjamin Péret, in the introduction to his Anthology of Sublime Love (Paris, 1956), further identified "sublime love", a state of realized idealisation mayhap equatable with the romantic grade of passionate beloved.
  37. ^ a b c d Anders Theodor Samuel Nygren, Eros and Agape (first published in Swedish, 1930–1936).
  38. ^ "Philosophy of Love | Net Encyclopedia of Philosophy". world wide web.iep.utm.edu. Archived from the original on 29 August 2017. Retrieved 24 August 2017.
  39. ^ Thomas Köves-Zulauf, Reden und Schweigen, Munich, 1972.
  40. ^ JFK Miller, "Why the Chinese Don't Say I Love You Archived 24 Jan 2010 at the Wayback Auto"
  41. ^ a b c d eastward Ryang, Sonia (2006). Love in Modernistic Japan: Its Estrangement from Cocky, Sex and Society. Routledge. pp. xiii–14. ISBN978-1-135-98863-0. Archived from the original on 11 July 2016. Retrieved 3 February 2016.
  42. ^ a b c d Abe, Namiko. "Japanese Words for "Dearest": The Deviation between "Ai" and "Koi"". Nearly.com. Archived from the original on 5 November 2014. Retrieved 5 November 2014.
  43. ^ Monier Williams, काम, kāma Archived 19 Oct 2017 at the Wayback Machine Monier-Williams Sanskrit English Lexicon, p. 271, see 3rd column
  44. ^ James Lochtefeld (2002), The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism, Volume 1, Rosen Publishing, New York, ISBN 0-8239-2287-1, p. 340
  45. ^ See:
    • Kate Morris (2011), The Illustrated Dictionary of History, ISBN 978-81-89093-37-2, p. 124;
    • Robert E. Van Voorst, RELG: World, Wadsworth, ISBN 978-1-111-72620-1, p. 78
  46. ^ R. Prasad (2008), History of Scientific discipline, Philosophy and Culture in Indian Civilization, Volume 12, Function ane, ISBN 978-81-8069-544-5, pp. 249–270
  47. ^ Rig Veda Volume 10 Hymn 129 Archived sixteen February 2018 at the Wayback Automobile Verse four
  48. ^ Ralph Griffith (Translator, 1895), The Hymns of the Rig veda Archived 10 April 2016 at the Wayback Automobile, Book X, Hymn CXXIX, Verse four, p. 575
  49. ^ Wolpe, David (xvi February 2016). "We Are Defining Love the Wrong Manner". Time. Archived from the original on 26 February 2019. Retrieved 14 February 2019.
  50. ^ a b Pope Bridegroom XVI. "papal encyclical, Deus Caritas Est". Archived from the original on 8 October 2011. Retrieved xi June 2008.
  51. ^ Woo, B. Hoon (2013). "Augustine's Hermeneutics and Homiletics in De doctrina christiana". Journal of Christian Philosophy. 17: 97–117.
  52. ^ "Sri Lanka – Philippines: Meeting with the young people in the sports field of Santo Tomas University (Manila, 18 Jan 2015) – Francis". w2.vatican.va. Archived from the original on 23 February 2018. Retrieved 24 February 2018.
  53. ^ Nidoy, Raul (xiii Feb 2015). "The cardinal to beloved according to Pope Francis". Archived from the original on 24 February 2018. Retrieved 24 Feb 2018.
  54. ^ Jesus and the adult female taken in adultery
  55. ^ Swartley, Willard M. (1992). The Love of Enemy and Nonretaliation in the New Testament, Studies in peace and scripture; (Equally Scapulam I) cited by Hans Haas, Idee und Ideal de Feindesliebe in der ausserchristlichen Welt (Leipzig: University of Leipzig, 1927). Westminster John Knox Press. p. 24. ISBN978-0-664-25354-vii.
  56. ^ Lewisohn, Leonard (2014). Cambridge Companions to Religion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Printing. pp. 150–180.
  57. ^ "Bahá'í Reference Library – Paris Talks". reference.bahai.org. pp. 179–181. Archived from the original on xx Baronial 2014. Retrieved four September 2014.
  58. ^ Gour Govinda Swami. "Wonderful Characteristic of Krishna Prema, Gour Govinda Swami". Facebook. Archived from the original on 29 November 2012. Retrieved 7 January 2012.
  59. ^ A C Bhaktivedanta Swami. "Beingness Perfectly in Love". Archived from the original on 23 November 2014. Retrieved 7 January 2012.
  60. ^ The Handbook Archived 13 June 2010 at the Wayback Automobile of the Oneida Community claims to have coined the term around 1850, and laments that its utilise was appropriated by socialists to attack spousal relationship, an institution that they felt protected women and children from abandonment
  61. ^ McElroy, Wendy (1996). "The Gratis Dearest Motility and Radical Individualism". Libertarian Enterprise. nineteen: 1.
  62. ^ Spurlock, John C. Free Love Marriage and Middle-Class Radicalism in America. New York, NY: New York UP, 1988.
  63. ^ Passet, Joanne E. Sex Radicals and the Quest for Women'southward Equality. Chicago: U of Illinois P, 2003.
  64. ^ a b Laurie, Timothy; Stark, Hannah (2017), "Love's Lessons: Intimacy, Pedagogy and Political Community", Angelaki: Journal of the Theoretical Humanities, 22 (four): 69–79, doi:10.1080/0969725x.2017.1406048, S2CID 149182610
  65. ^ Soren Kierkegaard. Works of Love.

Sources

  • Chadwick, Henry (1998). Saint Augustine Confessions. Oxford: Oxford Academy Press. ISBN978-0-19-283372-3.
  • Fisher, Helen (2004). Why Nosotros Dearest: the Nature and Chemistry of Romantic Love. New York : H. Holt. ISBN978-0-8050-6913-6.
  • Giles, James (1994). "A theory of love and sexual desire". Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour. 24 (4): 339–357. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5914.1994.tb00259.x.
  • Kierkegaard, Søren (2009). Works of Love. New York City: Harper Perennial Mod Classics. ISBN978-0-06-171327-9.
  • Oord, Thomas Jay (2010). Defining Love: A Philosophical, Scientific, and Theological Engagement. G Rapids, MI: Brazos. ISBN978-1-58743-257-6.
  • Singer, Irving (1966). The Nature of Dearest. Vol. (in 3 volumes) (v.ane reprinted and afterward volumes from The University of Chicago Press, 1984 ed.). Random Firm. ISBN978-0-226-76094-0.
  • Sternberg, R.J. (1986). "A triangular theory of beloved". Psychological Review. 93 (two): 119–135. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.93.2.119.
  • Sternberg, R.J. (1987). "Liking versus loving: A comparative evaluation of theories". Psychological Message. 102 (three): 331–345. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.102.3.331.
  • Tennov, Dorothy (1979). Honey and Limerence: the Experience of Beingness in Dear. New York: Stein and Day. ISBN978-0-8128-6134-1.
  • Wood Samuel East., Ellen Wood and Denise Boyd (2005). The World of Psychology (fifth ed.). Pearson Pedagogy. pp. 402–403. ISBN978-0-205-35868-7.

Further reading

  • Bayer, A, ed. (2008). Art and love in Renaissance Italy. New York: The Metropolitan Museum of Fine art.

External links

  • History of Honey, Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
  • Friendship at Curlie
  • Philanthropy at Curlie
  • Romance at Curlie

kennettrove1967.blogspot.com

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Love

0 Response to "Ovid the Art of Love Long Term Relationship or Short Term Relationship"

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel